NCARB raising the ARE fees in October

So my return to blogging is not starting off on the right foot.  I must have a lot of pent up anger that I do not know about.  Well anyways it was announced a couple of months ago that the National Council of Architectural Registration Board (NCARB) is going to be raising the exam fee beginning October 1st of 2009.  They are raising the fee from $170 to $210.  Only $40? Those of you not in the profession may be asking why are you bitching about $40.  Well multiply that by 7.  That brings the grand total of the Architectural Registration Exam (ARE) to $1,470.  That is more than the bar exam that lawyers have to take.  And in most cases they make much more money than architects.  And what make this number even more difficult to swallow is that most architectural firms do not reimburse their employees for taking the exams, let along giving them the time off needed to take the exams that range from 2-6 hours in length.

The attached blog post from the Architectural Record (NCARB Increasing Test Fees), gives some incite into why NCARB is raising their fees.  However this is not a good thing for the profession.  Already the trend for most architecture graduates is to never obtain their architectural registration that would allow them to legally practice architecture on their own.  As long as they are working for an architectural firm they see no need.  However this is resulting in less people getting registered every year.

Home Builders Green Washing – Energy Efficiency

I return to blogging with a rant that has been rankling with the home building industry.  Again, I know it is not good to burn bridges, but the home building industry is taking advantage of the uneducated home buyer so they can make some extra money.  This is all in regards to their claims of energy efficiency.

Builder Energy Efficiency Claims

Builder Energy Efficiency Claims

I borrowed this image from a home builder here in Ohio (I removed any reference to the company’s name).  Take a look at what they are claiming that is going to protect our investment and on another page our environment.  They even created their own cute little “Energy Wise” logo.  The materials listed are standard building materials found in every building in the United States.  And don’t get fooled by the Thermo-ply, its name has nothing to do with thermal efficiency, it more of an air barrier.  Standard structural sheathing has a higher R-Value.  The SEER rating on the air conditioning unit is the minimum size you can even purchase now.  The biggest kicker is the insulation levels that they state.  If you see the attached chart from the Ohio Building Code, R-38 ceiling and R-13 is code minimum for climate zone 4. Well most of Ohio is Climate zone 5.  So that R-13 does not cut it according to the chart. Still time after time I see homes going up everywhere that is 2×4 wall construction and no exterior insulation.  I mean the easiest thing a builder can do is to switch to 2×6 wall construction.

TABLE 1102.1 INSULATION AND FENESTRATION REQUIREMENTS BY COMPONENT

TABLE 1102.1 INSULATION AND FENESTRATION REQUIREMENTS BY COMPONENT

Read the rest of this entry »

Energy Inspector – Every state should have one

A couple of week ago the New York Time published an article about a new inspector that the construction industry will have to deal with.  This person is the Energy Inspector.  From what the article states, the inspector is to observe the conditions of the insulation that is installed by the contractors correctly, making sure that there are not gaps that could cause the building owner money over the long term.

Now the energy inspectors job is similar to a  thermal bypass inspection that energy raters do for new home construction when the builder is seeking an energy star rating.  However the biggest difference is the inspector has the authority to make the contractor fix any mistakes.  Therefore, it would be great to see these inspectors start to pop up more throughout the country.

A New Enforcer in Buildings, the Energy Inspector

Wide Variation in Energy Codes

Residential Energy Codes

AUSTIN, Tex. — Peering behind a bathtub in a newly built house, an inspector, John Umphress, spotted a big gap in the wall insulation. “Somebody took a lunch break!” he complained to the builder, who sheepishly agreed to patch the hole.

With the fix, the house, already a model of energy efficiency, will use even less energy and save its residents money — for decades.

But that small catch would not have been made in many American towns. Mr. Umphress is a particular kind of inspector, an energy auditor, and Austin, with one of the toughest building codes in the country, requires an energy inspection before a building can be occupied.

Climate scientists and architects say that no single policy change could do more to save energy over the long run — and reduce the nation’s contribution to global warming — than building codes that make saving energy the law.

Since the energy crises of the 1970s, the United States has known it has an energy problem. Yet today, the energy requirements in building codes remain weak across half the country, and at least seven states have virtually no rules. That means that in many places, particularly the nation’s heartland, almost every new home, store and factory that goes up locks the country into unnecessary energy use for years to come.

The problem is not just construction defects like the one Mr. Umphress caught, though those are plentiful. In many places, builders are still using too little insulation. Citing cost, they have not adopted the most energy-saving water heaters, roofing materials or window panes.

Continue reading the article at The New York Times

New home durability further reducing during down times

I came across this post just recently about the new home building industry.  I always knew that the vast majority of the production/track homes were of lesser quality construction because those builders are driven by profits, not quality.  But this post opened my eyes a little more.  So with a good marketing team and uneducated home buyers, builders at still trying to give their buyers the amenities that they think are important, and taking away what makes a home long lasting and healthy place to live.

“Destruction” of Home Quality – words may offend!

Posted by Mr. Grant Dorris via Consilience: The blog

I want everyone to think about a staggering statistic – 80% of all homes are built by only 20% of all builders. This ultimately means that a small percentage of homebuilders control the end products that are available to consumers. Most all of these homes would be classified as production built or tract built homes. This relatively small percentage of builders can take one of two paths:

1. Understand that it is their responsibility to build safe, comfortable living environments that balance with their surrounding natural environments – and accomplish this by integrating planning & design with climate & site analysis to maximize the energy efficiency, durability, indoor environmental quality and water conservation of the structures they build, while simultaneously minimizing waste and our impact on natural resources.

2. Choose the path that is fast, labor saving, cheap, and based on cleverness rather than quality – basically the exact opposite of Path #1.

Unfortunately, most choose Path #2.

Continue reading the article at Consilience: The blog

LEED Credentialing…..Its about time

As we quickly approach the last week for the current LEED AP v2.2 exam track, I say it is a long time coming.  When I first took the exam back in 2004 I was of the opinion that the more people that had their LEED AP the better.  Because ultimately it meant more people understood the issues and were on a level playing field in terms of their knowledge.

However over the past couple of years as the LEED rating system has picked up steam, my opinion of the exam has changed.  Too many people are taking the exam now and not for the right reasons.  Most people who are taking it are only taking the exam to have the LEED AP after their name.  It’s all for marketing purposes.  They don’t have any additional knowledge.  They just studied the reference manual and took the exam.  The majority of them do nothing to push the green building movement.  Heck, some of the people are not even in the design and construction industry.  Read the rest of this entry »